[Daniele Bailo]

Good morning
I’m also new in this group and I would like provide my “2 cents”.
Having read the full thread so far, it looks like there are two different
approaches:
– Sandra’s & co. approach, which focus more on the commonalities.
– Alex’ & co. approach, which focus on the differences.
(sorry Sandra and Alex for using you as a proxy for groups of people with
same views).
Working with VRE and SG, I tend to agree with Sandra&co. that it might be
beneficial to remark commonalities, , unless it is really necessary to
emphasize the differences.
In addition to this, consider that a) also within the same category (e.g.
VREs) there are a number of different implementations, understanding and
architectures available, which makes any definition flexible; b) some RIs
(or VL or SG), for instance those funded by EU, tend to gradually increase
their functionalities and are hence in a shadow area between – for instance
– SG and VRE (if we use the definitions proposed by Keith and Mark).
best
Daniele
Daniele Bailo, PhD
EPOS Management Office ICT – INGV
Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Rome – Italy
Phone. +39 06-51860728 – Fax. +39 06-51860507
Curare le scienze e non amare le persone, è come accendere una torcia e
chiudere gli occhi.
http://www.epos-eu.org | http://www.danielebailo.it | bit.ly/Bailo-INGV
*Get informed with the EPOS Newsletter
*
2018-02-23 10:01 GMT+01:00 mcrichlow :

Discussion