Re: [tab][sharc-ig][gofair] Re: [sharc-ig][gofair] RDA P15 Melbourne – Session Acceptance…
-
Discussion
-
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Dear all,
Of course you can have Go FAIR speakers in the session !
Wish you the happiest new year !
Regards
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-31
15:19, IP2904 via GO FAIR IG a écrit :
> Dear Yvan,
>
> As mentioned,
TAB decided that this session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG.
>
> Best Wishes et bon réveillon !
>
>
Amicalement / Yours
>
> Isabelle
>
> Le 2019-12-24 17:12, ylebras
via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
>
> Dear Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are working on the
“draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning
of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially
called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR
RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are
involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
>
>
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
> Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (S
HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
> Dear Sharing Rewards
and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
>
> At
its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered
your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>
> Unfortunately,
TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL UNLESS YOU MAKE THE
CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO PROCEED YOU WILL
NEED TO:
> 1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns
BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
> 2. ADVISE ***@***.*** THAT
YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review your response
>
> Requested
improvements:
>
> -This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG
(OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting
for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should
thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
> – The abstract
looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas.
This needs to be rectified before acceptance.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
>
> —
> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>
> Stop
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
Log in to reply.