[Yvan Le Bras]

Dear Isabelle,
Hope all is doing well on your side.
We are working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC IG session?
Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further questions.
Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
Best,
Yvan
Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG” a écrit :
Dear Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest Group,
 
At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020. 
 
Unfortunately, TAB is not able to accept your session proposal unless you make the changes that are listed below. If you still wish to proceed you will need to:
1. Update the session description to address TAB’s concerns by or before Jan 2nd, 2020
2. Advise i***@***.*** that you have done this so TAB can review your response
 
Requested improvements:
 
 
-This is listed as a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG
– The abstract looks like a draft, with lots of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified before acceptance. 
 
Best regards,
 
Isabelle Perseil, TAB co-chair
 
 
 
–Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglistStop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308
–Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglistStop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309

Discussion

[Isabelle PERSEIL]

Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67309
>
Dear Yvan,
As mentioned, TAB decided that this session should thus be
resubmitted just as a session of the SHARC IG.
Best Wishes et bon
réveillon !
Amicalement / Yours
Isabelle
Le 2019-12-24 17:12,
ylebras via Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) IG a écrit :
> Dear
Isabelle,
>
> Hope all is doing well on your side.
>
> We are
working on the “draft” state of the abstract but we are not sure of what
is the meaning of the first requested improvement. This session can’t be
officially called a joint session because RDA is waiting something from
the GO FAIR RDA IG so even if GO FAIR BiodiFAIRse IN & others GO FAIR
people are involved in the session, we must resubmit “just” as a SHARC
IG session?
>
> Don’t hesitate to come back to me for further
questions.
>
> Wishing you a happy Christmas and end of year.
>
>
Best,
>
> Yvan
>
> Le 23 déc. 2019 09:52, “IP2904 via Sharing Rewards
and Credit (S HARC) IG” a écrit :
>
>> Dear
Sharing Rewards and Credit (SHARC) Interest Group and GO FAIR Interest
Group,
>>
>> At its meeting on December 19, the RDA Technical Advisory
Board considered your proposal for a session at Plenary 15 in 2020.
>>
>> Unfortunately, TAB IS NOT ABLE TO ACCEPT YOUR SESSION PROPOSAL
UNLESS YOU MAKE THE CHANGES THAT ARE LISTED BELOW. IF YOU STILL WISH TO
PROCEED YOU WILL NEED TO:
>> 1. Update the session description to
address TAB’s concerns BY OR BEFORE JAN 2ND, 2020
>> 2. ADVISE
***@***.*** THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS so TAB can review
your response
>>
>> Requested improvements:
>>
>> -This is listed as
a Joint Session of the SHARC IG (OK) and GO FAIR IG. This is not
acceptable since TAB is still waiting for an update of the initial GO
FAIR IG charter. This session should thus be resubmitted just as a
session of the SHARC IG
>> – The abstract looks like a draft, with lots
of question marks and incomplete areas. This needs to be rectified
before acceptance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Isabelle Perseil, TAB
co-chair
>>
>> —
>> Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-conservation-ig/post/rda-p15-melb…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/67308 —
>> Full
post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/sharing-rewards-and-credit-sharc-ig-go…
>>
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
>>
Stop emails for this post:
>

[Author]

Replies