[Paul Uhlir]

Hi all:
We have received 10 reviews: 3 from RDA, 4 from CODATA, and 3 independent
lawyer reviews (from my co-authors on a legal interoperability law review
article, which is also almost completed and which you will have an
opportunity to review later next month). All the review comments have been
integrated and are attached as follows:
– A Summary that consolidates all the general comments in response to the
seven questions that we posed for the review, with more details about the
organization of the documents;
– A document of consolidated comments on just the Principles;
– A document of consolidated comments on the Implementation Guidelines,
which are more voluminous.
You will note that the reviews were generally positive and useful, but one
reviewer, “CODATA A”, was very critical and spent a lot of time on this. I
found his comments particularly helpful and hope you do too. As a result of
his insights, we should strongly consider consolidating and shortening both
the Principles and Guidelines. I am not sending all the individual comments
since they were all included and combined.
Please take a look at the attached files to get a flavor of the reviews.
Click on the margin notes and redlined comments if they do not appear
automatically. We suggest that we have a preliminary discussion of the
documents during the Friday telcon to get an idea of the substantive and
procedural issues. We can then send the draft responses and redlined
changes to the docs for discussion and consideration in the subsequent
Friday telcons. I believe we can finish the responses and all the changes
by February 19th.
Please send your thoughts in writing by this weekend, especially if you are
unable to participate in the call this Friday.
Cheers,
Paul Enrique Bob

Summary_comments_Master_24_Jan_2016_0.docx

Draft_Principles_for_the_Legal_Interoperability_of_Research_Data_3Dec15_Review_master_24Jan2016.docx

Markedup_Draft_Implementation_Guidelines_for_Legal_Interoperability_151205-FINAL-Review_Master_24Jan2016.docx

Discussion

[Jean Bernard Minster]

from a quick look, I agree that reviewers, (especially A) worked hard at it. I think A has a good point about trimming the principles. B.

[Author]

Replies