[ENRIQUE ALONSO GARCIA]

Hi all,
Considering the issue about “… or to distribute any documents we’ve collaboratively drafted for RDA review” and Simon´s answer “That would not be appropriate until the document is published in late February.”, ….
I give for granted, though, that distribution is allowed and recommended for databases or e-infrastructures of the current list of use cases when they have meetings in which they can advance some of their analysis. That implies among others iMarine (now BlueBridge), and CReATIVE-B (now Globis-B) which have a meeting and a workshop, respectively, in late January and late February (we had already agreed to this in the final telecom we had in late November, so this is only a reminder).
In any case, since workshop 1 of Globis-B coincides with the RDA-CODATA meeting in Japan, the version of the Principles and Guidelines that will be the one commented or considered will very possibly be be the post-review February one; but since we have in Ámsterdam next week a preparatory meeting of the said Workshop 1 very posible we will agree there to distribute the current version for those who will attend the Globis-B workshop, letting them know that by the time of the meeting they will have the Feb post-review one.
I´ll ask the FAO and Siena managers of iMarine (BlueBridge) VRE e-infrastructure about their schedule of meetings in January-February in order to see if they need the current version or they can wait until February.
Take care
________________________________
De: ***@***.***-groups.org [***@***.***-groups.org] En nombre de puhlir [***@***.***]
Enviado el: domingo, 10 de enero de 2016 18:54
Para: Simon CODATA; RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
CC: Gail Peretsman-Clement
Asunto: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Re: RDA guidelines and policies re: individual publishing
Agreed on all points. Thanks
Paul
– Show quoted text -On Jan 10, 2016 12:13 PM, “Simon Hodson” wrote:
Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
My view is that it is positively encouraged: I think it is a good thing ito talk about this work, to flag the forthcoming report and to discuss the challenges.
It’s understood that we are not to individually speak *FOR* RDA Legal Interop
No. But one can speak as a member of the group.
… or to distribute any documents we’ve collaboratively drafted for RDA review.
That would not be appropriate until the document is published in late February.
Any particular policy or guidelines to consider? Boundaries to observe?
My via is that one can discuss the document short of distributing it until the publication date.
Any other views?
With very best wishes,
Simon.
___________________________
NEW! CALL FOR SESSION PROPOSALS, SCIDATACON 2016, DEADLINE 14 FEB 2016: http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/
NEW! INTERNATIONAL DATA WEEK, 11-17 SEPTEMBER 2016: http://www.internationaldataweek.org/
OPEN DATA IN A BIG DATA WORLD, SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL ACCORD: http://bit.ly/opendata-bigdata
___________________________
Dr Simon Hodson | Executive Director CODATA | http://www.codata.org
E-Mail: ***@***.*** | Twitter: @simonhodson99 | Skype: simonhodson99
Blog: http://www.codata.org/blog
Diary: http://bit.ly/simonhodson99-calendar
Tel (Office): +33 1 45 25 04 96 | Tel (Cell): +33 6 86 30 42 59
CODATA (ICSU Committee on Data for Science and Technology), 5 rue Auguste Vacquerie, 75016 Paris, FRANCE
On 10 Jan 2016, at 00:31, Peretsman-Clement, Gail wrote:
Hello RDA Legal Interop colleagues!
This is to inquire with the collective about RDA policies on member’s publishing or presenting on topics that are being discussed and addressed in RDA working or interest groups. To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
It’s understood that we are not to individually speak *FOR* RDA Legal Interop, or to distribute any documents we’ve collaboratively drafted for RDA review.
Any particular policy or guidelines to consider? Boundaries to observe?
Many thanks for considering – Adhering to the highest professional and ethical standards is of chief concern, so any thoughts you all might share would be very helpful!
Best regards,
Gail
Gail P. Clement | Head of Research Services | Caltech Library | Mail Code 1-43 | Pasadena CA 91125-4300 | 626-395-1203
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-4806 | library.caltech.edu
—
Full post: https://rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/post/r…
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/50845
________________________________
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient, dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.

Discussion