Skip to main content

Notice

The new RDA web platform is still being rolled out. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Please report bugs, broken links and provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Stay updated about the web site milestones at https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/.

Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig]

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #123860

    Willi Egloff
    Member

    Dear Christoph
    If we have to put references to each sentence in these implementation
    guidelines, we will end up with a rather complicated and
    contradictionnary document. It is clear that in scientific literature
    exist various opinion on many of the discussed points. I think that we
    discussed quite a series of them during our phone calls. The actual text
    is the result of these discussions, and we should not reopen the discussion.
    As far as the copyrightability of research data is concerned, I’m quite
    aware of the discussion within the EU. In the licensing study of
    OpenAIRE, which has been published in various form (see e.g. Dietrich
    N., Guibault L., Margoni T., Siewicz K., Spindler G., Wiebe A., OpenAIRE
    Study on licensing of publications and research data, Amsterdam 2013
    (http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/OpenAIRELicensingStudy_Summary.pdf),
    the authors present the legal situation in France, Germany, Italy, the
    Netherlands and Poland. We did the same in a study in the framework of
    the EU BON project for the legal situation in Denmark, France, Germany,
    Italy, Norway, Sweden and United Kingdom (Egloff W. et al., Open
    exchange of scientific knowledge and European copyright: The case of
    biodiversity information, Zookeys 414.109-135, 2014; DOI:
    10.3897/zookeys.414.7717
    ). The OpenAIRE
    study refers primarily to EU research documents in form of publications,
    the EU BON study refers to biodiversity information, mostly in form of
    organised research data. This explains some variations in the evaluation
    of the copyright situation. The main findings, however, do not differ
    substantially. But neither of them is an exhaustive presentation of the
    discussion about copyrightability of research data, that would be worth
    citing in the context of the implementation guidelines.
    Best regards,
    Willi

Log in to reply.