[Simon Hodson]

Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
> To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
My view is that it is positively encouraged: I think it is a good thing ito talk about this work, to flag the forthcoming report and to discuss the challenges.
Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
> To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
My view is that it is positively encouraged: I think it is a good thing ito talk about this work, to flag the forthcoming report and to discuss the challenges.
> It’s understood that we are not to individually speak *FOR* RDA Legal Interop
No. But one can speak as a member of the group.
Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
> To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
My view is that it is positively encouraged: I think it is a good thing ito talk about this work, to flag the forthcoming report and to discuss the challenges.
> It’s understood that we are not to individually speak *FOR* RDA Legal Interop
No. But one can speak as a member of the group.
> … or to distribute any documents we’ve collaboratively drafted for RDA review.
That would not be appropriate until the document is published in late February.
Dear Gail, all;
Thanks for this.
> To the point, is it okay for us, as individual professionals, to present on legal interoperability issues and research data to groups outside of RDA?
My view is that it is positively encouraged: I think it is a good thing ito talk about this work, to flag the forthcoming report and to discuss the challenges.
> It’s understood that we are not to individually speak *FOR* RDA Legal Interop
No. But one can speak as a member of the group.
> … or to distribute any documents we’ve collaboratively drafted for RDA review.
That would not be appropriate until the document is published in late February.
> Any particular policy or guidelines to consider? Boundaries to observe?
My via is that one can discuss the document short of distributing it until the publication date.
Any other views?
With very best wishes,
Simon.
___________________________
NEW! CALL FOR SESSION PROPOSALS, SCIDATACON 2016, DEADLINE 14 FEB 2016: http://www.scidatacon.org/2016/
NEW! INTERNATIONAL DATA WEEK, 11-17 SEPTEMBER 2016: http://www.internationaldataweek.org/
OPEN DATA IN A BIG DATA WORLD, SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL ACCORD: http://bit.ly/opendata-bigdata
___________________________
Dr Simon Hodson | Executive Director CODATA | http://www.codata.org
E-Mail: ***@***.*** | Twitter: @simonhodson99 | Skype: simonhodson99
Blog: http://www.codata.org/blog
Diary: http://bit.ly/simonhodson99-calendar
Tel (Office): +33 1 45 25 04 96 | Tel (Cell): +33 6 86 30 42 59
CODATA (ICSU Committee on Data for Science and Technology), 5 rue Auguste Vacquerie, 75016 Paris, FRANCE

Discussion

[Paul Uhlir]

Agreed on all points. Thanks

[Author]

Replies