Edited Draft Principles and Implementation Guidelines
-
Discussion
-
Dear colleagues,
Attached are redline and clean versions of the Principles and of the
Implementation Guidelines. The latter still have some questions that can
hopefully be addressed in the next couple of days by the main authors. Gail
has kindly agreed to format the Guidelines by Monday, using the formatting
we agreed to on an earlier telcon this month.
I have a family emergency and will not be on the telcon tomorrow, but Simon
will resend the instructions for the call. Those of you who have some
unfinished text or margin questions should try to get that completed no
later than Saturday and send it to the whole group, and especially Gail. It
is understood that these documents will be reviewed and then revised
further, so we all will have a chance to revisit it all this
January-February and even next spring, as these documents are beta tested
by some ongoing data projects.
I promised to provide a list of lawyers who are experts in legal
interoperability issues and could independently review these documents.
They are mostly in the US, so please broaden the geographic horizons with
some additional suggestions. The initial list is:
Michael Carroll, Prof of IP Law at American Univ
Anita Eisenstadt, at the Sci and Tech Policy Institute (which supports OSTP)
Nancy Weiss, on detail at OSTP from the Institute for Museum Library
Services (a US Federal agency)
Harlan Onsrud, Univ of Maine (law and remote sensing)
Jerome Reichman, Prof of IP Law at Duke Univ
Catherine Doldirina, European Commission.
Best wishes,
Paul
Draft_Principles_for_the_Legal_Interoperability_of_Research_Data_3Dec15_redline.docxDraft_Principles_for_the_Legal_Interoperability_of_Research_Data_3Dec15.docx
Draft_Implementation_Guidelines_for_the_Principles_on_Legal_Interoperability_3Dec15_redline.docx
Draft_Implementation_Guidelines_for_the_Principles_on_Legal_Interoperability_3Dec15.docx
Log in to reply.