WG on Raising FAIRness in health data and health research performing organisations
-
Discussion
-
Collaborative session notes (main session): https://docs.google.com/document/d/10e7AwD2zaYUibgTpkqO8WYcPI0NyvhsZKKKnMmURd1Q/edit?usp=sharing
Collaborative session notes (repeat session): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uTqCziTHpsy10rq0bv_e-ylvhwASLebGWYC2555ngso/edit?usp=sharingIntroduction and objectives of this meeting.
Background of the WG and results of previous meetings.
Results of landscape analysis: process followed and current status.
FAIRness for HL7 FHIR (provisional)
Initial findings from impact assessments and policy analyses.
Community survey results (provisional).
Next steps.
Additional links to informative material
https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/raising-fairness-health-data-and-health-research-performing-organisations-hrposAre you willing to hold your session at multiple times to accommodate various time zones?
YesAvoid conflict with the following group (1)
Health Data Interest GroupAvoid conflict with the following group (3)
FAIR Data Maturity Model WGContact for group (email)
S.Venkataraman@ed.ac.ukGroup chair serving as contact person
Shanmugasundaram VenkataramanMeeting objectives
This meeting will primarily demonstrate the ongoing tasks that were outlined in the case statement. Specifically, we will discuss the global landscape analysis of FAIR adoption which was initiated by the co-chairs and which requires input and review from the WG and the community. After officially kicking off the WG at VP16, we anticipate nearing completion of this landscape analysis. Based on the initial findings from this report, we will use the meeting to also discuss the other concurrent tasks of (1) impact assessment of any identified barriers, and (2) analysis of national and international level policies and guidelines. These latter two tasks are projected to run further on compared to the landscape analysis and this meeting will be used to discuss how this time should be managed and to invite participation from WG members. Finally, we will (provisionally) also show initial results from a (3) community survey that polled requirements from the community.Please indicate the breakout slot (s) that would suit your meeting
Breakout 1, Breakout 2, Breakout 3, Breakout 4, Breakout 6, Breakout 7, Breakout 11Privacy Policy
1
Log in to reply.