WG on Raising FAIRness in health data and health research performing organisations
-
Discussion
-
Collaborative session notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbIrbHTDsGNlwpbuMOIhslgy3iX2qNghkeIKbphQQs0/edit?usp=sharing
Introduction and objectives of this meeting.
Background of the WG and results of previous meetings and brief results of landscape analysis.
Results of impact assessment and community survey.
Guest speaker
Genneral discussion and next steps.
Additional links to informative material
https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/raising-fairness-health-data-and-health-research-performing-organisations-hrpos
http://www.fair4health.euApplicable Pathways
The FAIR Agenda, Discipline Focused Data IssuesAvoid conflict with the following group (1)
Health Data Interest GroupAvoid conflict with the following group (3)
FAIR Data Maturity Model WGContact for group (email)
S.Venkataraman@openaire.euGroup chair serving as contact person
Shanmugasundaram VenkataramanMeeting objectives
This meeting will primarily demonstrate the ongoing tasks that were outlined in the case statement. Specifically, we will discuss the impact assessment of FAIR adoption which was initiated by the co-chairs and which requires input and review from the WG and the community. This impact assessment is the follow-up to the previous landscape analysis and which was finalised. At the last plenary (VP17) we showcased that work and at this one we wish to discuss this imapct assessment as well as:potential targets for testing and implementation of draft outputs from this WG
discuss the results of a community survey that was conducted to assess levels of FAIR compliance and knowledgeWe will also have a guest speaker which is TBC.
After officially kicking off the WG at VP16, we anticipate nearing completion of this landscape analysis. Based on the initial findings from this report, we will use the meeting to also discuss the other concurrent tasks of (1) impact assessment of any identified barriers, and (2) analysis of national and international level policies and guidelines. These latter two tasks are projected to run further on compared to the landscape analysis and this meeting will be used to discuss how this time should be managed and to invite participation from WG members. Finally, we will (provisionally) also show initial results from a (3) community survey that polled requirements from the community.Please indicate the breakout slot (s) that would suit your meeting
Breakout 2, Breakout 3, Breakout 5, Breakout 6, Breakout 8, Breakout 9, Breakout 11, Breakout 12, Breakout 14, Breakout 15, Breakout 17, Breakout 18, Breakout 20, Breakout 21, Breakout 23, Breakout 24Please select breakout slot (s) for your (optional) second live session.
Breakout 2, Breakout 3, Breakout 5, Breakout 6, Breakout 8, Breakout 9, Breakout 11, Breakout 12, Breakout 14, Breakout 15, Breakout 17, Breakout 18, Breakout 20, Breakout 21, Breakout 23, Breakout 24Privacy Policy
1
Log in to reply.