[Paul Millar]

Hi guys,
I was wondering whether we could propose a joint session between the DMP
Common Standards WG and Storage Service Definitions WG?
Due to the limited number of slots available, I believe a joint session
proposal is more likely to be accepted. Also, there is (likely) some
overlap between the work we are doing in SSD WG and the DMP-common WG,
which would be good to explore.
Would such a proposal for a joint session be of interest?
Cheers,
Paul.

Discussion

[Tomasz Miksa]

Hi Paul,
It would be great to explore commonalities between our groups – like we discussed during the plenary in Berlin.
Unfortunately, we have already submitted our proposal. However, we are happy to adapt our agenda [in case our proposal gets accepted] to include discussion on synergies with your group.
Alternatively, we could try to submit another proposal for a joint session, maybe also including somebody from the Repositories group?
Best wishes,
Tomasz
– Show quoted text -From: paul.millar=***@***.***-groups.org
On Behalf Of paul
Sent: środa, 27 czerwca 2018 12:22
To: ***@***.***-groups.org
Subject: [dmp-common] Possible joint session at RDA P12
Hi guys,
I was wondering whether we could propose a joint session between the DMP Common Standards WG and Storage Service Definitions WG?
Due to the limited number of slots available, I believe a joint session proposal is more likely to be accepted. Also, there is (likely) some overlap between the work we are doing in SSD WG and the DMP-common WG, which would be good to explore.
Would such a proposal for a joint session be of interest?
Cheers,
Paul.
—
Full post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/dmp-common-standards-wg/post/possible-…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/59958

[Mikael Borg]

On 06/27/2018 05:54 PM, tmiksa wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> It would be great to explore commonalities between our groups – like
> we discussed during the plenary in Berlin. Unfortunately, we have
> already submitted our proposal. However, we are happy to adapt our
> agenda [in case our proposal gets accepted] to include discussion on
> synergies with your group.
>
> Alternatively, we could try to submit another proposal for a joint
> session, maybe also including somebody from the Repositories group?
Either way would be fine with me, but the deadline is only 6 hours away,
so time is of the essence. From the Storage Service Definitions WG I
guess we want to explain our goals, show what we have done so far,
solicit feedback and try to get more people to engage.
Apparently, there will be fewer sessions at P12 — only 63 compared to
80–90 in Berlin. Thus RDA will encourage joint sessions.
Kind regards,
/Mikael
Either way would be fine with me, but the deadline is only 6 hours away,
so time is of the essence. From the Storage Service Definitions WG I
guess we want to explain our goals, show what we have done so far,
solicit feedback and try to get more people to engage.
Apparently, there will be fewer sessions at P12 — only 63 compared to
80–90 in Berlin. Thus RDA will encourage joint sessions.
Kind regards,
/Mikael

[Paul Millar]

Hi DMP-common-ers,
In the end, we applied for a “Storage Session Defn WG” session for P12
with the title “How to get the most science for your money?”
In the submission, we asked the organisers try to avoid any clash
between the session (if approved) and the “WG DMP Common Standards” session.
So, you are all more than welcome to attend!
Also, in the proposed SSD session agenda, we’ve kept a slot for someone
to give a short intro to DMP Common Standards, with corresponding
discussion.
So this email is also an invitation for you guys to present your work
within the context of SSD, assuming the SSD session goes ahead.
Cheers,
Paul.

[Author]

Replies