[Iain Hrynaszkiewicz]

Dear Data Policy standardisation and implementation IG members,
On behalf of the co-chairs I’m pleased to share a report from our last meeting, at RDA P11 in Berlin:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SrjUPMGqF-C6zioOqZ4NsCkCtTTpENS5anSP…
The report includes links to the presentations and other relevant documents. The summary and next steps is also below.
We will be in contact in due course with the next version of the framework.
Kind regards
Iain
Summary and next steps
The third official meeting of the interest group (IG) presented the first draft output of the group and the feedback received on the output – a Journal and publisher research data policy master framework. IG members and the wider community now have until end of April 2018 to provide feedback on the policy framework, after which time the co-chairs will begin preparing version 1.3 of the master framework and begin drafting the policy templates. The co-chairs anticipate sharing these next documents July-September 2018. The co-chairs will also determine if a working group (WG) needs to be formed around the master framework output or if the activity continues as an IG. A related project on standardising Data Accessibility Statements (DASs) – a key part of journal data policy – managed by the Belmont Forum group of funding agencies was also presented and discussed. The Belmont Forum project is holding monthly calls over 2018 and aims to present their next findings at RDA 12th Plenary.
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
Head of Data Publishing
Open Research Group
Springer Nature
The Campus | Trematon Walk | Wharfdale Road | London N1 9FN
M: +44 (0)7814 290576
T: +44 (0)207 0146753
***@***.***
http://www.springernature.com
ORCiD: 0000-0002-9673-5559
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Macmillan Publishers Limited does not accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender’s own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Ltd or one of their agents.
Please note that Macmillan Publishers Limited and their agents and affiliates do not accept any responsibility for viruses or malware that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any).

Discussion

[Valerie McCutcheon]

Hello Iain and All,

Is there any further update from the April 2018 note above?

In particular I am looking at supplemental data again.  At present we generally treat it as one of the publication files rather than a dataset on our repositories.  The lines are blurred.  It looks like we will need to retain a way to identify that there are supplemental files rather than the final dataset at least for the medium term due to the implementation issues noted.

If there are any other thoughts or outcomes to this discussion would be interested to hear.  Perhaps there is another meeting planned soon and there willl be an update.

 

 

 

[Nick Sheppard]

Related to this I irritated a chemist at a recent RDM session when she asked about supplementary data and, thinking of this IG, I suggested the sector should be moving away from supplementary towards data repositories. She was on the editorial boards of a couple of journals and said that in her experience they were seeing more supp data, not less, and that she certainly didn’t have time or inclination to also prepare data for a repository. Perhaps highlights a disciplinary specific issue? (I didn’t find out what the journals were!)

[Iain Hrynaszkiewicz]

Dear Valerie, Dear all,
The Data Policy Standardisation and Implementation IG is being presented at the RDA Plenary happening today, at 14,00 local time (12 noon GMT) in Botswana. Please see for more information:
https://www.rd-alliance.org/joint-meeting-wg-biosharing-registry-and-dat…
Including how to join the session remotely. Please join if you are able to (apologies it is very short notice).
Unfortunately none of the co-chairs of the group were able to attend this RDA Plenary, but my colleague Varsha Khodiyar at Springer Nature will be presenting, on our behalf, a recap of the group’s work to date and sharing an update on the next steps for the group, including timeline for the revision to the master policy framework that was presented in Berlin in March.
This session is a joint – informative rather than working – session between the Data Policy Standardisation and Implementation IG and the FAIRsharing WG, in collaboration with the Belmont Forum, who will update on their Data Accessibility Statement project too.
I hope to see many of you online later today, and in Philadelphia in person in 2019.
Kind regards
Iain
Meeting objectives for joint meeting: Journal Data Policy Standardization for FAIRer data: where we are, what is next.
1. Update group members and session participants on general activities of these groups focussing on the convergences, and seek feedback.
1.1. The Data Policy Standardisation and Implementation IG will present the latest draft of the journal policy research data policy master framework, which will be shared in the run-up to Plenary
1.2. The Bio/FAIRsharing WG will present the latest work to enhance the description and discoverability of the data policies, inter-linked to the databases, repositories and standards recommended
1.3. The Belmont Forum will presents its project on standardising Data Accessibility Statements (DASs) – a key part of journal data policy; this work will also be presented and discussed.
2. Discussion on possible joint activities among these three groups, and ways to engage stakeholders on policy and DAS implementation and the Bio/FAIRsharing WG is planning for its next phase.
3. Attract further members to the group(s).
4. Identify next steps.
Meeting agenda
– Brief overview of the groups: objectives and progress to date (45 mins)
– Proposed convergences and possible next steps: guided discussion (40)
– Next steps and wrap up (5 mins)
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
Head of Data Publishing
Open Research Group
Springer Nature
The Campus | Trematon Walk | Wharfdale Road | London N1 9FN
M: +44 (0)7814 290576
T: +44 (0)207 0146753
***@***.***
http://www.springernature.com
ORCiD: 0000-0002-9673-5559
– Show quoted text -From: Valerie.McCutcheon=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of mccutchv
Sent: 02 November 2018 09:49
To: Data policy standardisation and implementation IG
Subject: Re: [rda-data-policy-standardisation-ig] Report from RDA P11 Interest Group meeting
Hello Iain and All,
Is there any further update from the April 2018 note above?
In particular I am looking at supplemental data again. At present we generally treat it as one of the publication files rather than a dataset on our repositories. The lines are blurred. It looks like we will need to retain a way to identify that there are supplemental files rather than the final dataset at least for the medium term due to the implementation issues noted.
If there are any other thoughts or outcomes to this discussion would be interested to hear. Perhaps there is another meeting planned soon and there willl be an update.
—
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/data-policy-standardisation-and-implem…
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/59414
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Springer Nature Limited does not accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender’s own and not expressly made on behalf of Springer Nature Ltd or one of their agents.
Please note that Springer Nature Limited and their agents and affiliates do not accept any responsibility for viruses or malware that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any).

[Author]

Replies