Skip to main content

Notice

The new RDA web platform is still being rolled out. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Please report bugs, broken links and provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Stay updated about the web site milestones at https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/.

Re: [rda-dft-wg] A start on some candidate vocabulary and testing a vocabulary…

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #128947

    Raphael Ritz
    Participant

    On 11/28/13 9:58 AM, Yde wrote:
    > Dear Gary,
    >
    > Thanks for this!
    >
    > I see quite some similarities with the Knowledge Organization System
    > (KOS ) for biodiversity information, especially
    > the Term Forum WiKi .
    If you are referring to the system used to offer this
    service then this is indeed the same that GBIF explores:
    the Semanic Mediawiki including the Semantic Forms
    add-on.
    >
    > Did you communicate with the GBIF people on this (especially Eamonn O
    > Tuama )?
    Yes to both,
    Raphael
    >
    > Kind regards,
    >
    > Yde
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Op 27 nov 2013, om 22:21 heeft Gary het volgende geschreven:
    >
    >>
    >>
    >> We are testing out some candidate vocabulary using RDA Term
    >> Collection Wiki prototype
    >> .
    >> The small attachment to this positng illustrates this using the
    >> Wittenburg model sketch which has a series of related assertions that
    >> include key a functional grouping of terminology. The idea is to use
    >> these diagrams to evoke the terminology needed to understand them.
    >> The take the key assertion of the diagram to be something like this:
    >>
    >>
    >> 1. A PID record that points to a metadata record and
    >> to instantiations of identical bit-streams that may store
    >> additional attributes (in a repository);
    >> I I have some of the terms underlined and these now have
    >> candidate definitions which have been placed in the tool to encourage
    >> its testing as well as discussion of the candidate definitions using
    >> the tool. Some example are provided in the attachment and reproduced
    >> here. For example:
    >>
    >> 1. A persistent identifier (PID) is generally agreed is a
    >> long-lasting (non-corrupting) reference to informational content that
    >> distinguishes a digital or data object (such as a document, an
    >> individual file or a collection of files) from other DOs.
    >> 2. A Data Object is a type of object or collection composed
    >> of discrete data, considered as a unit, representing an instance or
    >> instances of a datatype that is known or assumed to be known [adapted
    >> from ISO/IEC 2382-17]. Data objects are referenced by identifiers
    >> (IDs). A data object or record’s content may be expressed at
    >> bitstreams and there may be multiple instances of the same bitstream
    >> called a copy of a data object.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Attached files:
    >> Small Illustration of DFT Vocabulary.docx
    >>
    >> —
    >> Full post:
    >> https://rd-alliance.org/start-some-candidate-vocabulary-and-testing-voca
    >> Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
    >> Stop emails for this post:
    >> https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/1035
    >
    >
    >
    On 11/28/13 9:58 AM, Yde wrote:
    > Dear Gary,
    >
    > Thanks for this!
    >
    > I see quite some similarities with the Knowledge Organization System
    > (KOS ) for biodiversity information, especially
    > the Term Forum WiKi .
    If you are referring to the system used to offer this
    service then this is indeed the same that GBIF explores:
    the Semanic Mediawiki including the Semantic Forms
    add-on.
    On 11/28/13 9:58 AM, Yde wrote:
    > Dear Gary,
    >
    > Thanks for this!
    >
    > I see quite some similarities with the Knowledge Organization System
    > (KOS ) for biodiversity information, especially
    > the Term Forum WiKi .
    If you are referring to the system used to offer this
    service then this is indeed the same that GBIF explores:
    the Semanic Mediawiki including the Semantic Forms
    add-on.
    >
    > Did you communicate with the GBIF people on this (especially Eamonn O
    > Tuama )?
    Yes to both,
    Raphael

Log in to reply.