• Output Type: Working Group Supporting Output
  • Output Status: Endorsed
  • Review Period End: 2021-02-15
  • DOI:
  • Group: FAIR Data Maturity Model WG
  • Standards:
  • Regions:
  • Language:

  • Non RDA Author(s)

  • Adopters

  • Abstract

    FAIR Data Maturity Model WG
    Group co-chairs: Edit Herczog, Keith Russell, Shelley Stall
    Supporting Output title: Member survey on bridging the gap between funders and communities – perspectives on benefits and challenges of FAIR assessments V2.0
    Authors: Christophe Bahim, Makx Dekkers, Edit Herczog, Keith Russell, Shelley Stall
    DOI: 10.15497/RDA00061
    Citation: Christophe Bahim, Makx Dekkers, Edit Herczog, Keith Russell, Shelley Stall (2021). Survey on bridging the gap between funders and communities – perspectives on benefits and challenges of FAIR assessments. Research Data Alliance. DOI: 10.15497/RDA00061

    Abstract:

    This report provides a consolidated view of the answers collected during a survey conducted in October 2020. This survey took place in the context of the work of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group and aimed at investigating the differences of perspectives on benefits and challenges of the FAIR assessments between funders and research communities.

    Please note that the text below refers to the previous version of the Supporting Output, which underwent community review in January / February 2021. Version 2.0 was updated after the community review phase, and can be found here.

    FAIR Data Maturity Model WG
    Group co-chairs: Edit Herczog, Keith Russell, Shelley Stall
    Supporting Output title: Survey on bridging the gap between funders and communities – perspectives on benefits and challenges of FAIR assessments
    Authors: Christophe Bahim, Makx Dekkers, Edit Herczog, Keith Russell, Shelley Stall

    Abstract:

    This report provides a consolidated view of the answers collected during a survey conducted in October 2020. This survey took place in the context of the work of the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group and aimed at investigating the differences of perspectives on benefits and challenges of the FAIR assessments between funders and research communities.

  • Impact Statement

  • Primary Field or Expertise

    Mathematics

  • Explanation of Sustainable Development Goals

  • Citations

  • Primary Domain: Natural Sciences
  • RDA Pathways:
  • Group Technology focus: Data (Output) Management Planning
  • Regions:
  • Stakeholders:
  • Sustainable Development Goals:
No comments found.