There is no such content in this group
Posts
Re: [rda-fairsharing-wg][rda-data-policy-standardisation-ig] Request: Biomedical Data License review
by Simon Hodson
Sending also to this lists which I think is relevant. S. ___________________________ ONE WEEK TO GO, DEADLINE 8 JULY! Call for Presentations and Posters: CODATA 2019 Beijing REGISTRATION OPEN: CODATA 2019 Beijing , Towards next-generation data-driven science: policies, practices and platforms, 19-20 September June 2019 Publications in the CODATA Data Science Journal Stay in touch with CODATA: Stay up to date with CODATA activities: join the CODATA International News list0 | Add new comment
Request: Biomedical Data License review
Dear RDA community, On behalf of one of my colleagues at NTNU (The Norwegian University of Science and Technology), I would like to ask for feedback on a draft for a Biomedical Data License which is coordinated by HUNT data center https://www.ntnu.edu/mh/huntcloud/. See below for the full request. I am a new member of RDA, and I do apologize if these groups are not the most suitable. Any suggestions of other groups or communities (also outside RDA) that would be relevant to contact are highly appreciated.0 | Add new comment
RDA Plenary 14th in Finland: Registration is Open and other Details!
by Julie Arteza
Dear members of the FAIRSharing Registry Working Group, Registration for RDA Plenary14 is now open!0 | Add new comment
FAIRsharing WG output is now an RDA recommendation
Dear RDA colleagues, On behalf of my co-chairs and I, it is with great pleasure that I am able to announce that the FAIRsharing joint RDA/Force11 WG output has been fully recommended by the RDA. The output from this WG is now among the 12 RDA “flagship” Outputs (full list at: https://tinyurl.com/RDArecommendations), which are the official, endorsed results of the groups, substantiated by community adoption and use.0 | Add new comment
RDA FAIRsharing WG output and adoption: FAIRer Resources for FAIRer Data
Dear RDA colleagues, Today, in an open access /Nature Biotechnology/ article, *69 authors* have come together as a community, representing the core *adopters*, *advisory board members*, and/or key *collaborators* of FAIRsharing (https://fairsharing.org), a resource launched in 2011 and matured under the guidance of the *joint Force11 and RDA WG* and it international userbase community. The article presents the mission and work of FAIRsharing, and shows the0 | Add new comment
Registration Now Open for RDA Plenary 13 in Philadelphia
Register today for RDA Plenary 13 (P13), to be held from 2-4 April 2019 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at the Loews Hotel. Early bird pricing is available only until 2 March 2019. Register today at https://www.rd-alliance.org/registration-now-open-rda-plenary-13-philadelphia.0 | Add new comment
[question] Re: [rda-biosharing-wg] IMPORTANT NOTICE: New Group mailing list
Dear Sara and Secretariat, Many thanks for the changes and the notification. Can you please clarify (also to the WG members) if we/they need to register again to the new one. I guess and hope not, but imo it is not clear. Also, from tracking and provenance shall we assume the messages sent - during these last two years - to the list will remain visible on the (new) WG webpage? Kind regards Susanna (Sent from my phone) -- --1 | Add new comment
Updates: WG rename and pre-print publication
Dear RDA WG member, two updates: 1. RDA has approved the rename on our WG (from BioSharing to FAIRsharing) 3. The co-chairs are in the process of finalizing and submitting the FAIRsharing WG recommendations for final community feedback; I will email the list when this is out. 2. See the pre-print on "FAIRsharing, as a cohesive community approach to the growth in standards, repositories and policies" at https://doi.org/10.1101/245183 co-authored by stakeholders from0 | Add new comment
Proposed solution for outputs of this group/possible further work
Dear members of the RDA BioSharing WG, TAB has been discussing the question of the name of the recommendations from this group, and avenues for further work. As Susanna indicated yesterday, I agreed to send an email to the group with some proposals for you to consider. 1. Name of the Recommendations We understand why this has now changed to FAIRSharing, to reflect the expanded scope of the recommendation (undertaken under the FORCE11 banner), and the name of the registry.0 | Add new comment