Perhaps some of you were as surprised as me to receive this mail with “recommendations on what we should do next”.
I could certainly comment on the contents of the document - e.g. the references to HEP, the EIROforum - but my main issue is process. Is DFIG - of even a subset - tasked to make such “recommendations”?
Maybe I am mis-reading this mail; maybe it is another example of “volunteer” work (and not official); maybe I have mis-read the Council mandate?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Wittenburg