I agree completely with this 'define for working and later refine' approach. K
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
---- Alan Blatecky wrote ----
I think building a joint vocabulary is urgent as well. However, if we aren’t careful, we could find ourselves caught up in endless discussions trying to get precise definitions (that is, "the perfect is the enemy of the good”). We need to get rough consensus so we can spend time on issues other than definitions.
On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Peter Wittenburg <***@***.***> wrote: