Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

Draft RDA Outputs Policy

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #88959

    Mark
    Participant

    Friends,
    It was harder than I anticipated and i raised as many questions as answers, but I finally have a first draft Outputs policy together. See:
    https://rd-alliance.org/groups/rda-outputs-and-ip-task-force/wiki/draft-
     
    It is based on our discussion and the initial document from Herman and Peter.
     
    It’s a wiki, so please edit the draft at will. Alternatively, you can add comments at the bottom of the document. Remember, everything we do is public.
     
    We can discuss next steps on Monday. I’ll put together an agenda after I see some of your feedback, but some key issues include:

    Does this policy apply to all RDA outputs or just those from WGs or WGS and IGs? I took the broader approach
    Did I get the classifications right?
    Can IGs produce formal endorsed Recs on Data or just WGs?
    Are we ready to seek broader input or get legal experts involved?

Log in to reply.