Re: Conference call February 27 re Legal Interoperability Principles for Research Data

thanks Simon
________________________________
De: execdir=***@***.***-groups.org [execdir=***@***.***-groups.org] En nombre de Simon Hodson [***@***.***]
Enviado el: viernes, 27 de febrero de 2015 17:03
Para: Paul Uhlir; RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG
CC: ***@***.***; ***@***.***; Ellenbroek, Anton (FIPS); Paweł Kamocki (***@***.***); P Kishor (***@***.***); Michael Carroll (***@***.***); ***@***.***; ***@***.***; Catherine Doldirina; Enrique Alonso García; Bob Chen
Asunto: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Re: Conference call February 27 re Legal Interoperability Principles for Research Data
Dear friends and colleagues, CODATA-RDA IG on Legal Interoperability Principles for Research Data,
Please find below and attached my notes from this afternoon’s call.
I had some audio difficulties so did not follow or note all the substantive discussion around Credit/Attribution, but I think that i have captured all the key decisions.
I look forward to seeing those of you who will be in San Diego.
With very best wishes,
Simon.
15-02-27-Legal Interoperability Group
Agenda:
1) Finalise the principles.
2) Discuss the session at RDA.
Principles
First three are unchanged.
Principle four is fine.
Discussion of order of final three principles.
Attribution and credit should be distinguished. Attribution a legal term (e.g. CC-BY). Credit a social convention in research. So the principles should mention the legal issue of attribution and support the social convention of credit. Attribution can be required by a license. We should nevertheless support the social convention of credit.
Suggestion that metadata should come after four. Then attribution and credit. Seems appropriate to end with responsibilities. So…
5: Transparency.
6: Attribution and Credit.
7: Equity
8: Responsibilities.
Guidelines
A few pages per principles. Provides explanatory texts and guidelines on implementation. PU suggests that we should work on the guidelines and this may oblige us to revisit the principles.
What is the relationship between the use cases and the guidelines?
Three pronged approach: principles, guidelines and use cases.
Use cases provide a real world application of the principles (and guidelines).
San Diego Session
PU suggests that there will only be enough time to discuss process rather than substantive issues. Review principles without opening it up to substantive discussion - but encourage written comments within a strict timescale.
Outline of guidelines will be handed out.
Conclude with a discussion of the use cases. The discussions should focus on methodology and process, but not substance. Outline of the implementation guidelines will be discussed at the breakfast meeting - will be shared by e-mail before.
Wrapping up
Please put any further comments on the principles in writing and send them in before the San Diego Session.
________________________________
El texto de este correo es confidencial y exclusivamente está dirigido a su destinatario. Si se ha enviado a una dirección errónea rogamos elimine el mismo y, en su caso, los documentos adjuntos, y nos lo comunique urgentemente. This message is intented only for the use of the addresse and contain confidential information. If you are not the intented recipient, dissemination of this documentation is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please, erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately.
Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico, piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.