Dear All,
FYI – should you need to acknowledge RDA on papers.
Brian
– Show quoted text -From: Mary O’Brien Uhlmansiek
Sent: 29 July 2020 22:43
To: Pickering J.B.
Subject: Re: RDA attribution
Brian,
Here’s the template language I found on the RDA website: “This work was developed as part of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) ‘WG/IG’ entitled ‘long name (short name)’, and we acknowledge the support provided by the RDA community and structures.”
Thank you very much for thinking about this, as it is hugely important for tracking RDA’s impact! Please just let me know if you need further assistance.
Regards,
Mary
Mary O’Brien Uhlmansiek, MA
Director, Implementation & Outreach
Research Data Alliance – US/RNA
https://www.rd-alliance.org
ORCID: 0000-0002-7949-2057
Skype: Mary Uhlmansiek
___________________________________________________________________________________
RDA 16th Plenary Meeting, 10 – 12 November 2020, San Jose, Costa Rica – see updates
RDA 17th Plenary Meeting, April 2021, Edinburgh, Scotland – see updates
IDW2021 (co-organised by RDA, CODATA and WDS and incorporates 18th RDA Plenary Meeting), 8-11 November 2021, Seoul, Republic of Korea – see updates
IDW2023 (co-organised by RDA, CODATA and WDS and incorporating the RDA Plenary Meeting), 23-26 October 2023, Salzburg, Austria – see updates
From: “Pickering J.B.”
Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 5:53 AM
To: Mary O’Brien Uhlmansiek
Subject: RDA attribution
Hi Mary,
I’m sorry to be thick (again!). If our WG produces a paper as a result of collaboration between ourselves, I can see that there should be an acknowledgement to RDA. Is there some guidance that even the slow learners like me would understand? And would the acknowledgement be of a specific form, like: We would like to acknowledge support from the RDA COVID-19 initiative, or some such?
Any pointers welcome
Brian

Homepage