RE: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Final revisions to Implementation Guidelines prior to second...

Dear Gail and Paul
An option would be to submit the article to the new RIO journal which then would allow to include reviewers, public comments if desired etc. It would publish our recommendation and guidelines properly, we’ll have a DOI to cite it and work with one of the most advanced publishers in the area of OA publishing.
Here is the Web site (http://rio.pensoft.net) and here the EU BON data sharing policy we just published http://rio.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=8458 .
I am involved in the semantic backbone, the oa policy of the journal.
Cheers
Donat
- Show quoted text -From: gperetsm=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of Repositorian
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 4:46 PM
To: Peretsman-Clement, Gail <***@***.***>; RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Final revisions to Implementation Guidelines prior to second...
Colleagues,
Please forgive the unintended spamming- I am very sorry! The RDA website stalled out during my posting so I apparently hit the save button a few too many times.
Drinks on me in Denver, ok?
;-) Gail
From: gperetsm=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of Repositorian
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:36 AM
To: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Final revisions to Implementation Guidelines prior to second review
Thanks Paul!
A question for our group: what preferences are there for sharing the final document for reviewers at the Force2016 conference next week? My poster on teaching objectives based on this group’s work was accepted, and the conference is asking presenters to submit their contributions to an open access conference site via FigShare. The submission includes the group by formal name as a Contributor to the session. (This was based on a prior discussion on this list about a possible prez at Force2016)
Any concerns if the final document that goes out to reviewers is included in the Force2016 conference site? It would be clearly labelled as the draft for review as of xx date.
Thanks for considering!
Gail
Gail P. Clement | Head of Research Services | Caltech Library | Mail Code 1-43 | Pasadena CA 91125-4300 | 626-395-1203 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-4806 | library.caltech.edu
--
Full post: https://rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/post/f...
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/51905
Dear Gail and Paul
An option would be to submit the article to the new RIO journal which then would allow to include reviewers, public comments if desired etc. It would publish our recommendation and guidelines properly, we’ll have a DOI to cite it and work with one of the most advanced publishers in the area of OA publishing.
Here is the Web site (http://rio.pensoft.net) and here the EU BON data sharing policy we just published http://rio.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=8458 .
I am involved in the semantic backbone, the oa policy of the journal.
Cheers
Donat
From: gperetsm=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of Repositorian
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 4:46 PM
To: Peretsman-Clement, Gail <***@***.***>; RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Final revisions to Implementation Guidelines prior to second...
Colleagues,
Please forgive the unintended spamming- I am very sorry! The RDA website stalled out during my posting so I apparently hit the save button a few too many times.
Drinks on me in Denver, ok?
;-) Gail
- Show quoted text -From: gperetsm=***@***.***-groups.org [mailto:***@***.***-groups.org] On Behalf Of Repositorian
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 7:36 AM
To: RDA/CODATA Legal Interoperability IG <***@***.***-groups.org>
Subject: Re: [rda-legalinterop-ig] Final revisions to Implementation Guidelines prior to second review
Thanks Paul!
A question for our group: what preferences are there for sharing the final document for reviewers at the Force2016 conference next week? My poster on teaching objectives based on this group’s work was accepted, and the conference is asking presenters to submit their contributions to an open access conference site via FigShare. The submission includes the group by formal name as a Contributor to the session. (This was based on a prior discussion on this list about a possible prez at Force2016)
Any concerns if the final document that goes out to reviewers is included in the Force2016 conference site? It would be clearly labelled as the draft for review as of xx date.
Thanks for considering!
Gail
Gail P. Clement | Head of Research Services | Caltech Library | Mail Code 1-43 | Pasadena CA 91125-4300 | 626-395-1203 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-4806 | library.caltech.edu
--
Full post: https://rd-alliance.org/group/rdacodata-legal-interoperability-ig/post/f...
Manage my subscriptions: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://rd-alliance.org/mailinglist/unsubscribe/51905