07
Jul
2014
Active Data Management Plans BoF
Description / Abstract / Agenda:
Active Data Management Plans 1
Date & Time: BREAKOUT3 Monday 22 Sept 2014, 15.30 – 17.00
Please comment on the draft agenda below - this will cover both sessions.
Active Data Management Plans 2
Date & Time: BREAKOUT4 Tuesday 23 Sept 2014, 11.30 – 13.00
This session will provide a unique opportunity to bring together work which has been on-going over the past few months.
In particular it will allow the European members, many of whom will have been involved with EINFRA-1 bids, some of which will certainly involve data management plans, to expose their thinking to each other and to the non-European participants.
On the basis of these discussions a finalised Case Statement can be produced.
Groups audience:
Active Data Management Plans IG
Chairs:
David Giaretta
Do you plan to have more than one session? If so specify how many:
Ideally 2 sessions
Preference to avoid conflicting schedule with the following WG/IG/BoF group meetings:
Preservation IG
Author: David Giaretta
Date: 15 Sep, 2014
ADMP Draft Agenda
TIMEà
Proposal stage
Implementation stage
Handover stage
Preserve usability and adding value
Data
Rough ideas
Increasingly detailed
Complete
Appraise
COMPONENTS
Metadata
Rough ideas
Increasingly detailed
Complete
Have we got enough/right type?
Continue
Add more for targeted communities
Rights
Fairly firm
Very detailed
Complete
Too restrictive?
Continue
Distrib.
Fairly firm
Increasingly detailed
Complete
“right” Persistent Identifiers?
Continue
Add linkages
Archive
Initial ideas
Initial ideas
Decided
Where? What Cost
Continue
(Adding) value
Initial ideas
More detailed
Much more detailed
Review process
How, for whom
HELPERS
PEOPLE/ SKILLS NEEDED
Research
Research
Organisations facilitators
Data scientist
Data scientist, Data curator,
Multi-disciplinary scientists, Marketing experts
Techn. Needed
Integrated tools to capture metadata needed for usability and authenticity
Brokerage service
Shared repository service
Registry of Representation Information, Information Management, Secure storage, Annotation, Cross domain query, Quick look, Automated usage, Compute, Citation
FUNCTIONALITY
Monitoring
Paper based evaluation that guidelines are followed
Automated check on use of data descriptions
Semi-automated checks by approved repositories
Check usability by Designated Community, Audit repositories, Automated reporting of usage, Financial accounting, Evaluations by users
Dis-incentives
None
Desire to keep data for own use
Requires effort to prepare. Others may benefit. Lack of credit
Undefined costs, Difficult to identify target communities
Incentives
Mandated by funders
Mandated by funders
Build reputation
Mandated by funders
Data as a first class publications
Mandated by funders
Reputational advantage