Skip to main content

Notice

We are in the process of rolling out a soft launch of the RDA website, which includes a new member platform. Existing RDA members PLEASE REACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT using this link: https://rda-login.wicketcloud.com/users/confirmation. Visitors may encounter functionality issues with group pages, navigation, missing content, broken links, etc. As you explore the new site, please provide your feedback using the UserSnap tool on the bottom right corner of each page. Thank you for your understanding and support as we work through all issues as quickly as possible. Stay updated about upcoming features and functionalities: https://www.rd-alliance.org/rda-web-platform-upcoming-features-and-functionalities/

Data and Metadata Quality in the Social Sciences

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #134079

    Collaborative session notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yvHl-LRcA7q9xtwMSx0BlEJoKlT979vxIZTL
    Introduction (5 min)
    Introduction to the SSIG and the data quality program for the group.
     
    Data quality in the social sciences (20 min)

    Data quality in official statistics (Statistics Canada – to be confirmed)

    Quality assessment in international social science data projects – the International Social Survey Programme (Steven McEachern, ANU)

    Quality review and curation for reproducible and FAIR research (Limor Peer, Yale University and Thu-mai Christian, University of North Carolina)

     
    Metadata quality (20 min)

    The CESSDA Metadata Office (Carsten Thiel – CESSDA Main Office, Norway)

    New data types and metadata extraction developments (Mari Kleemola, Finnish Social Science Data Archive, Finland )

    FAIRsFAIR and F-UJI demonstration (Ingrid Dillo, DANS, Netherlands)

     
    Development of quality assurance in other domains (20 min)

    Data quality in the earth and environmental sciecnes (Barbara Magnana – ENVRI – to be confirmed)

    Health/Life Sciences – BY-COVID and COVID-19 integrating projects (Katharina Lauer – Elixir)

     
    Breakout discussion 20 min (3 groups)
     
    Outcomes and next steps 10 min
    Our proposed outcomes are the development of a working group across multiple interest groups, to develop the following proposed outputs:

    Conceptual paper: Defining data and metadata quality

    Conceptual paper: Dimensions of data and metadata quality

    Establishing a working group on data quality within and across domains

     

    Additional links to informative material
    Documentation on data quality in official statistics:
    Australia: https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/Quality:+The+ABS+data+quality+framework 
    Canada: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-539-x/manage-gestion/4058322-eng.htm 
    Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/quality/quality-reporting 
     
    The FUJI FAIR Data Assessment Tool

    https://www.f-uji.net/

    https://www.fairsfair.eu/f-uji-automated-fair-data-assessment-tool 

    Applicable Pathways
    The FAIR Agenda, Discipline Focused Data Issues

    Avoid conflict with the following group (1)
    Sensitive Data Interest Group

    Avoid conflict with the following group (3)
    CURE-FAIR WG

    Contact for group (email)
    steven.mceachern@anu.edu.au

    Group chair serving as contact person
    Steven McEachern

    Meeting objectives
    This is a proposed regular meeting of the Social Science Interest Group. The intent of the meeting is to further the third of the IG’s core areas of activity – data quality. To this end, we are convening an information and engagement session exploring data and metadata quality issues in the social sciences and related disciplines, bringing together key stakeholders in social sciences infrastructure and official statistics, along with other EOSC domain areas including ELIXIR (life sciences) and ENVRI (environmental sciences).
    Our proposed outcome of the session are the development of a working group across multiple interest groups, to work on the following proposed activities:

    Conceptualisation and definition of data and metadata quality

    Understanding the dimensions of data and metadata quality

    Establishing a working group on data quality within and across domains

    Please indicate the breakout slot (s) that would suit your meeting
    Breakout 2, Breakout 5, Breakout 8, Breakout 11, Breakout 14, Breakout 17, Breakout 20, Breakout 23

    Privacy Policy
    1

Log in to reply.