Dear
​Metadata Groups,
I
​’m forwarding this on behalf of the RDA Vocabulary Semantic Services IG.
Please
feel free to transfer this to other metadata/standardization/ontologies
related
​IGs or ​
WGs.
Thanks
​,
Rebecca, Keith, and Alex​
——————-
Dear all,
[Apologies for multiple receptions – this announcement has been sent to
multiple mailing lists of the ontology/semantic Web/linked
data/standardization communities.]
If you are somehow familiar with the use of ontologies, please consider
answering this survey.
In the context of the recent reconfiguration of the RDA Vocabulary Semantic
Services Interest Group [1], we are leading a task group focused on
ontology metadata.
The goal of this task group is to review the current state related to
metadata description of semantic resources in general (ontologies,
vocabularies, thesauri and terminologies); and discuss recommendations and
best practices in terms of metadata standards for ontologies.
To give insights to the group and drive our work, we have setup a survey on
the topic and would really appreciate your participation.
https://goo.gl/tXaaMf
The survey is anonymous and uses GForm. It should take about 10-15 minutes.
Please take a moment to send your feedback.
Thank you for your help
Clement Jonquet, Biswanath Dutta, Anne Toulet and Barbara Magana
[1] https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/vocabulary-services-
interest-group.html
Cordialement
Clement Jonquet
—
Full post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/agricultural-data-
interest-group-igad-wheat-data-interoperability-wg-biosharing-registry
Manage my subscriptions: https://www.rd-alliance.org/mailinglist
Stop emails for this post: https://www.rd-alliance.org/
mailinglist/unsubscribe/58924

Homepage